Case 3306419/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Nagy & others (see attached schedule) v Casual Dining Services Ltd (dissolved) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3306419/2020
- Decision date
- 17 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Nagy & others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment without a hearing after seeking representations on the proposed terms and giving reasons for those proposed terms. It found that the respondent had failed to comply with a requirement of section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, so the claim for a protective award succeeded.
The Tribunal made a protective award for the listed claimants, all of whom worked at one of the respondent's establishments where 20 or more employees worked and were dismissed as redundant on 2 July 2020. The award required the respondent to pay remuneration for a protected period beginning on 2 July 2020 and lasting 90 days, with the Recoupment Regulations applying.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for a protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.