Case 3306420/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Painter v RG&M Wadlow And Son Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3306420/2020
- Decision date
- 30 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Painter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Postle. The tribunal held that Mr G Painter had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded him damages of £1,539.11. It also found that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy and therefore entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,104.00.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £364.80. No further reasons or factual findings are set out in the judgment text. The awards recorded in the judgment total £6,007.91.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages for that sum. | Upheld | — | £1,539 |
| Redundancy | The judgment finds the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £4,104 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; no separate statutory label is stated in the text. | Upheld | — | £365 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,008
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.