Case 3306421/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Prince v 360 Synergy Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306421/2020
- Decision date
- 23 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Watford ET via Cloud Video Platform
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Prince
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 23 August 2021 before Employment Judge Brewer, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear. The judgment records that the claimant's claims for unauthorized deductions from wages and for breach of contract succeeded.
The tribunal awarded unpaid wages for January 2020 of £471.99, unpaid wages for February 2020 of £687.69, and unpaid wages for March 2020 of £644.92. It also awarded unpaid accrued untaken holiday pay of £549.90, described as 5 x £109.98.
The tribunal further awarded notice pay of £549.90. The total amount awarded by the judgment is £2,904.40.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's claim for unauthorized deductions from wages succeeded and awards unpaid wages for January, February and March 2020 plus unpaid accrued untaken holiday pay. The judgment does not separately label those items as distinct claims. | Upheld | — | £2,355 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded and awards notice pay of £549.90. | Upheld | — | £550 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,904
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.