Case 3306425/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Rutter v The Orangery in Twyford Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306425/2024
- Decision date
- 29 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Rutter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 29 September 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, or did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis struck out the claim. The judgment does not identify any substantive liability findings on the underlying complaint, and it records no monetary remedy.
The judgment was approved on 27 November 2025 and sent to the parties on 15 December 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. By a letter dated 29 September 2025, the Tribunal invited the claimant to make written representations or request a hearing on why strike out should not occur. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.