Case 3306443/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Nina Camp v Asphaltic Services Limited (in voluntary liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 3306443/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Nina Camp
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 11 November 2019 at Bury St Edmunds, before Employment Judge M Warren, the Respondent did not attend. The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's claims succeeded and ordered payment of holiday pay of £238.42 gross, wages of £596.07 gross, and notice pay of £7,152.84 gross, each stated to be taxable in the hands of the Claimant.
The tribunal also awarded £3,202.57 as compensation for unfair dismissal. It noted that the Claimant had already received the basic award in the form of a redundancy payment from the Insolvency Service. The total payable without deduction was £11,189.90, and the recoupment provisions did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay awarded gross and taxable in the hands of the Claimant. | Upheld | — | £238 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Wages awarded gross and taxable in the hands of the Claimant. | Upheld | — | £596 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded gross and taxable in the hands of the Claimant. | Upheld | — | £7,153 |
| Unfair dismissal | Compensation for unfair dismissal; the tribunal noted the Claimant had already received the basic award in the form of a redundancy payment from the Insolvency Service. | Upheld | — | £3,203 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,190
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,203
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.