Case 3306461/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Emma Mooney v Mattishall Sports and Social Club — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306461/2024
- Decision date
- 26 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taft REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Emma Mooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found Emma Mooney's complaint of unfair dismissal well-founded and held that she had been unfairly dismissed by Mattishall Sports and Social Club. The hearing was held at Cambridge via CVP on 18, 19 and 20 August 2025 before Employment Judge Taft.
The tribunal also found that, when the proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. In relation to that breach, the tribunal stated that there were no exceptional circumstances making an award of an amount equal to two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, and that it was not just and equitable to award an amount equal to four weeks' gross pay.
The judgment records that the parties agreed a single total sum payable to the claimant in respect of both the unfair dismissal claim and the written-particulars breach of £2,931.75. It does not break that total down between the two heads of claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal complaint well-founded and held that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The judgment records a single agreed total for this claim and the written-particulars issue together, but does not split the amount between them. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found that, when the proceedings were begun, the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. It recorded that two weeks' gross pay was not unjust or inequitable, and that four weeks' gross pay was not just and equitable. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,932
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.