Case 3306476/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Unite the Union & Others (see attached schedule) v Swallowtail Print Limited (In Administration) and 1 other — 2026
- Case reference
- 3306476/2025
- Decision date
- 7 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Unite the Union & Others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningUnite the Union's claim for a protective award on behalf of the members listed in the schedule succeeded against Swallowtail Print Limited (In Administration). The Tribunal found that the members worked at the establishment at 2 Drayton Industrial Estate, Taverham Road, Norwich, and were dismissed as redundant on or after 26 June 2025. Twenty or more employees at the establishment were made redundant or placed at risk of redundancy on or within 90 days of that date. The dismissals took place without any, or any adequate, consultation, so the first respondent failed to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The Tribunal found that the claims were presented within the time limit in section 189(5)(b), as the last dismissals occurred on 26 June 2025. The first respondent had filed no response; the Secretary of State for Business & Trade was included as statutory guarantor. Applying the principle that protective awards are punitive and should cover the maximum period unless circumstances make that unjust, the Tribunal awarded remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 26 June 2025. The Recoupment Regulations apply, and the judgment did not state a fixed monetary total.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The award covers a 90-day protected period beginning on 26 June 2025; no fixed monetary sum was recorded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(5)(b) of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- protective awards are punitive and should be for the maximum period unless circumstances make it just not to do so
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.