Case 3306485/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. S. Atkins v GPL 2024 Realisations Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306485/2024
- Decision date
- 2 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Douse
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr. S. Atkins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal held that the claimant's complaint under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded. The complaint was that the respondent failed to comply with the requirements of section 188 of the 1992 Act.
The Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a protective award under section 189(3) of the 1992 Act. The award was remuneration at the rate of one week's pay, stated as £772.50, for a period of 90 days beginning on 3 May 2024. The judgment states that the Recoupment Regulations apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment describes the successful complaint as a claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188. It orders a protective award at a weekly rate of £772.50 for 90 days, but does not state a bottom-line total. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(3) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.