Case 3306488/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Roman Kutkowski v Whistl UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3306488/2021
- Decision date
- 13 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Roman Kutkowski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 31 July, 1 August and 2 August 2023 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. The claimant, Mr Roman Kutkowski, was represented by Mr Z Piwowarek and the respondent, Whistl UK Limited, by Mr S Nicholls, counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaints of unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and unlawful deduction of wages were not well founded and dismissed them all. No separate remedy was awarded.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. The document therefore contains no further detailed findings beyond the dismissal of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.