Case 3306508/2024 · Employment Tribunal

Mr M Khan v London Bin Cleaning — 2025

Case reference: 3306508/2024
Decision date: 2 June 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M Khan

Respondent

London Bin Cleaning

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal at Watford, in an oral judgment given by Employment Judge Cowen on 2 June 2025, dealt with a complaint by Mr M Khan against London Bin Cleaning about the cancellation of a job interview. The judgment records that the claim was brought as discrimination on grounds of sex, race and religion.

The tribunal dismissed the claim. No written reasons are set out in the extracted judgment text, and no separate findings are given for each protected ground. The record does not contain any monetary award or other remedy.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Sex discrimination	The judgment records that the discrimination claim on grounds of sex, race and religion, arising from cancellation of a job interview, was dismissed. No separate findings were given for each ground.	Dismissed	Sex	—
Race discrimination	The judgment records that the discrimination claim on grounds of sex, race and religion, arising from cancellation of a job interview, was dismissed. No separate findings were given for each ground.	Dismissed	Race	—
Religion or belief discrimination	The judgment records that the discrimination claim on grounds of sex, race and religion, arising from cancellation of a job interview, was dismissed. No separate findings were given for each ground.	Dismissed	Religion or belief	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.