Case 3306520/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Ekins v Metric Solutions Ltd. — 2020
- Case reference
- 3306520/2020
- Decision date
- 20 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Price Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Ekins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr C Ekins, worked for Metric Solutions Ltd from 19 November 2018 as a Project Administrator and was made redundant on 17 April 2020. The dispute concerned whether a £4,000 commission payment was due on the Christopher Addison House project. The tribunal found that the claimant's 2018 written contract included a commission term, that it was not varied in 2019 to remove the entitlement, and that the January 2020 commission payment of about £4,200 for sales made in 2019 was inconsistent with the respondent's case that commission had ceased.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that, in a meeting in autumn 2019, Mr Cosgrove told him he would be paid £4,000 commission for Christopher Addison House. It found that the payment was not made conditional on the respondent's net profit, and that the March 2020 contract did not take effect as a variation because it was not accepted by the claimant. On that basis, the tribunal held that £4,000 remained owing when employment ended, so the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages and was also in breach of contract.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £4,000. It did not make any separate damages award for breach of contract because the same facts were already covered by the unlawful deduction claim and the claimant had not claimed additional loss.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that a commission payment of £4,000 was owing and unpaid in relation to the Christopher Addison House project. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held that non-payment of the commission was also a breach of contract, but it made no separate award because the same facts underpinned the wages claim and no additional loss was claimed. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.