Case 3306531/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kishorkumar Chauhan v Saffran Electrical & Power UK Limited and 3 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306531/2021
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Members
- Panel members
- Mr A Scott, Ms A M Telfer
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr Kishorkumar Chauhan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Kishorkumar Chauhan's claims against Saffran Electrical & Power UK Limited and three individual respondents at Watford Hearing Centre on 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 February 2024. The written record states that the decision was unanimous and was issued by Employment Judge G Tobin with lay members Mr A Scott and Ms A M Telfer.
The tribunal dismissed the race discrimination claim under s13 Equality Act 2010 and the age discrimination claim under s13 Equality Act 2010. It also dismissed the unfair dismissal claim under s94 Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons in writing. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. The final order was that the proceedings were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written judgment records that the claimant was not discriminated against on the grounds of race under s13 Equality Act 2010. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not set out separate written reasons. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | The written judgment records that the claimant was not discriminated against on the grounds of age under s13 Equality Act 2010. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not set out separate written reasons. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed in breach of s94 Employment Rights Act 1996. The written judgment contains the dispositive finding only and notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.