Case 3306532/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss V Stanyon v Complete Contracts Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306532/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss V Stanyon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the South East Employment Tribunal on 10 July 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Quill determined under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,448.20. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,224.07.
The judgment records that other claims will be decided in due course, so the matter is not fully concluded on these papers.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £9,448.20. | Upheld | — | £9,448 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,224.07. | Upheld | — | £1,224 |
| Breach of contract | Listed on gov.uk as a category but the judgment states 'Other claims will be decided in due course'; not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Listed on gov.uk as a category but the judgment states 'Other claims will be decided in due course'; not adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Listed on gov.uk as a category; the holiday pay element was awarded separately, and any remaining working time claims were deferred ('Other claims will be decided in due course'). | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,672
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.