Case 3306545/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3306545/2019
- Decision date
- 21 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 21 November 2019 before Employment Judge Alliott, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the claimant's claims had no reasonable prospect of success and were struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not set out substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims. It is a strike-out decision only, and the written record does not identify any monetary award or other remedy.
The tribunal noted that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment does not identify the individual claim types; this classification follows the GOV.UK listing categories for the case. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims under Rule 37(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment does not identify the individual claim types; this classification follows the GOV.UK listing categories for the case. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims under Rule 37(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The written judgment does not identify the individual claim types; this classification follows the GOV.UK listing categories for the case. The tribunal struck out the claimant's claims under Rule 37(1)(a) because they had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37(1)(a)
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.