Case 3306560/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Elliot, Friend For the v Mr J Campbell, Solicitor — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306560/2020
- Decision date
- 29 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Elliot, Friend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford on 14-15 October 2021, before Employment Judge Bedeau, found that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded. It further held that the claimant contributed to his dismissal by 30%, and recorded that this contribution applied to both the basic and compensatory awards.
The judgment record states that the parties agreed the respondent would pay the claimant £19,000 by 4pm on 5 November 2021 in settlement of all matters relevant to remedy. The written record does not break that sum down into basic award, compensatory award, or any other component.
The claimant's wrongful dismissal claim was dismissed because it was withdrawn by the claimant. The record notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's stated procedure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim well-founded and held that the claimant contributed to his dismissal by 30%, applying to both the basic and compensatory awards. The judgment record does not split the agreed settlement sum between claims or award heads. | Upheld | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claimant withdrew this claim, and it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.