Case 3306600/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306600/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Douse
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant sums for breach of contract. These related to failure to pay a signing-on bonus due with September 2018 pay, failure to pay employee pension contributions to the pension provider for 1 August 2018 to 30 June 2019, and failure to pay employer pension contributions for the same period.
The Tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay wages that fell due between 1 July 2019 and 30 June 2020. The wages award represented the shortfall between the sum properly payable to the claimant and the sum actually paid by the respondent in that period.
The total award under those heads was £22,203.15 net. The Tribunal separately made a preparation time order requiring the respondent to pay £570 for 15 hours at £38 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award comprised £3,217.64 net signing-on bonus, £1,083.72 net employee pension contributions, and £693.24 net employer pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £4,995 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as wages falling due between 1 July 2019 and 30 June 2020, being the shortfall between the sum properly payable and the sum actually paid. | Upheld | — | £17,209 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,203
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.