Case 3306603/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Carter v Net Care Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306603/2020
- Decision date
- 13 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Members
- Venue
- Norwich
- Panel members
- Mr Doyle, Mr Chinn-Shaw
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S Carter
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Carter, brought sexual orientation discrimination claims against Net Care Limited and Thomas Duncan McEwan. The case was heard at Norwich Employment Tribunal on 15 to 17 November 2021 before Employment Judge M Warren, sitting with lay members Mr Doyle and Mr Chinn-Shaw.
The written judgment records only the tribunal's operative decision: the claimant's sexual orientation discrimination claims failed and were dismissed. The decision note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual procedure.
No monetary remedy was awarded in the written record provided, and no further findings of fact or legal reasoning are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.