Case 3306605/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alireza Hassanzadeh v AKZ Security Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306605/2021
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Alireza Hassanzadeh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr Hassanzadeh's employment transferred from The Red Lion (Junction 6) Limited to AKZ Security Limited on 22 February 2021. It also recorded that he was dismissed on 24 February 2021. Applying regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, the tribunal held that liability for the claims in the proceedings transferred to the first respondent.
As a result, the claim against the second respondent was dismissed. The second respondent's application for costs was also dismissed. The written record does not contain any substantive merits determination of the underlying claims in the proceedings, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found that the claimant's employment transferred on 22 February 2021 from The Red Lion (Junction 6) Limited to AKZ Security Limited and that, by virtue of regulation 4 of TUPE 2006, liability for the claims transferred to the first respondent. The claim against the second respondent was dismissed. No merits decision on the underlying claims was recorded in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- regulation 4 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.