Case 3306616/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Singh v Travelliance Inc — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306616/2021
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Halliday Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 15 and 16 November 2022, Employment Judge Halliday gave judgment that Mr Singh was an employee of Travelliance Inc. The written record states that the reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing.
The extract does not record any monetary remedy. It also states that written reasons will not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal held that the claimant was an employee of the respondent. No monetary award is recorded in this extracted judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.