Case 3306620/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Kilgannon v Matthew Clark Bibendum Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 3306620/2024
- Decision date
- 14 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Kilgannon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Reading on 13 and 14 January 2026 before Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst. The claimant was represented by Mrs McAsey and the respondent by Mr Lassey.
The written judgment states that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and failed. It records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Short judgment record only states that the unfair dismissal claim is not well-founded and fails; written reasons were not included. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.