Case 3306627/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Malgorzata Run v White’s Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306627/2024
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge EJ
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Malgorzata Run
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 12 July 2024. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
On the papers, the tribunal found that White’s Care Limited had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The judgment records that the respondent must pay Miss Malgorzata Run £1,551 gross.
No separate compensation, injury to feelings, interest, or other remedy is recorded in the judgment. The decision is signed by Employment Judge EJ M Warren and dated 13 March 2025, with the order sent to the parties on 19 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,551 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,551 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,551
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.