Case 3306638/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S O'Flaherty v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306638/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr S O'Flaherty
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 27 March 2022, the tribunal gave Mr S O'Flaherty an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated concerns were that there had been no response to the tribunal's letters of 17 August 2021 and 2 December 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr O'Flaherty did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Laidler struck out the claim on 17 May 2022, with the judgment sent to the parties on 18 May 2022. No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The short judgment does not repeat the pleaded complaint in detail; the case listing identified disability discrimination, and the tribunal struck out the claim for non-response and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment does not repeat the pleaded complaint in detail; the case listing identified an unlawful deduction from wages claim, and the tribunal struck out the claim for non-response and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.