Case 3306639/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Mazylyte v Sweet Indulgent Trio Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306639/2024
- Decision date
- 23 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Young Dated
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss D Mazylyte
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge proceeded under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and determined that the claim could properly be decided on the available material.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £872.00 gross. The judgment records a single bottom-line figure of £872.00 payable to the claimant, with no separate breakdown of components.
The judgment is brief and does not name lay panel members, cite specific legal tests, or address other heads of claim beyond the unauthorised deduction of wages.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 determination after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Judgment records unauthorised deductions from wages of £872.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £872 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £872
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.