Case 3306640/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr EK Mahmood Nationwide Law Associates For the v Mr G Young, from STM Group — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306640/2021
- Decision date
- 8 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr EK Mahmood Nationwide Law Associates For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing at Watford by CVP on 8 April 2022, the tribunal, constituted by Employment Judge G D Davison sitting alone, found that Mr F Amir's unfair dismissal claim was well founded. The judgment does not set out the oral reasons in writing, stating only that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The decision is a liability judgment only. It records that the case was listed for a remote remedies hearing before Employment Judge G D Davison on 30 May 2022 at 10:00am for half a day. No remedy figure is stated in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was well founded. The judgment records that the matter was listed for a remote remedies hearing before Employment Judge G D Davison on 30 May 2022 for half a day. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.