Case 3306643/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Shatalova v Kryptos Protocol Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306643/2024
- Decision date
- 2 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Shatalova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay the claimant GBP 7,655.00 gross. The claim of unfair dismissal was struck out for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay GBP 7,655.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £7,655 |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim is struck out for lack of jurisdiction. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,655
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.