Case 3306656/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kena-Abrokwa v KGB Cleaning and Support Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3306656/2020
- Decision date
- 28 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kena-Abrokwa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no response had been presented. Employment Judge R Lewis declared the claims for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, notice pay, unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay, as set out in the claim form, to be well-founded.
The judgment does not set out further findings of fact or reasons beyond the absence of a response. It records that any remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, notice of which will follow.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Judgment refers only to 'notice pay'; classified here as breach of contract because no more specific label is given. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment refers to 'unpaid wages' and declares that claim well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment refers to 'unpaid holiday pay' and declares that claim well-founded. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.