Case 3306658/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T. Mangat v Steer Automotive Group — 2019
- Case reference
- 3306658/2018
- Decision date
- 7 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T. Mangat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, before Employment Judge McNeill QC, upheld Mr T. Mangat’s unfair dismissal claim against Steer Automotive Group Ltd. The judgment records that the claim was well-founded and awards compensation of £16,274.72 in total, made up of a basic award of £4,401 and a compensatory award of £11,873.72.
The tribunal dismissed the claim for unlawful deductions from wages. It stated that the underpayments in the claimant’s salary in January and February 2018 had been accounted for in the compensatory award for unfair dismissal, so no separate award was made on that claim.
The claim for a redundancy payment was also dismissed. A further claim for a payment in lieu of annual leave was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim well-founded and awarded compensation of £16,274.72, comprising a basic award of £4,401 and a compensatory award of £11,873.72. | Upheld | — | £16,275 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the unlawful deductions claim and stated that the underpayments in January and February 2018 had already been accounted for in the compensatory award for unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for a payment in lieu of annual leave was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,275
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,401
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £11,874
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.