Case 3306663/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Page v Stepping Stones Childcare And Education (CIC) — 2020
- Case reference
- 3306663/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Page
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ord issued a Rule 21 judgment because no response had been received to the claimant’s claim. On the paper record, the tribunal found that Miss K Page had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex and pregnancy and maternity, as alleged in the claim form submitted to the tribunal on 15 July 2020.
The tribunal also found that she had suffered unlawful deductions from her wages. A separate hearing was to be held to determine remedy, so this judgment did not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Rule 21 default judgment; the tribunal used the combined wording "sex/ pregnancy and maternity". | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Rule 21 default judgment; the tribunal used the combined wording "sex/ pregnancy and maternity". | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages and listed a separate hearing to determine remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.