Case 3306665/2024 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v African Caribbean Day Nursery and Secretary of State for Business and Trade — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306665/2024
- Decision date
- 24 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe three claimants were employed by the first respondent at a children's nursery. The first respondent was struck off the Companies House register on 26 March 2024 and dissolved on 2 April 2024, but the claimants continued working and being paid until 13 June 2024, when they were told their employment had been terminated by reason of redundancy and directed to the Redundancy Payment Scheme. The claimants made references to the tribunal under s170 Employment Rights Act 1996 seeking confirmation of their entitlement and the amounts payable, and the Secretary of State for Business and Trade was joined as second respondent.
Employment Judge W Anderson found that, on the basis of the redundancy letters issued on 13 June 2024, the first respondent is liable to pay each claimant an employer's payment in the form of a redundancy payment under s166(1)(a) and (2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996. The judge accepted that, given the dissolution and the unequivocal direction to the Redundancy Payment Scheme, the claimants had taken all reasonable steps to recover the payment short of legal proceedings.
The payments were calculated from the information in the redundancy letters: £1,304.16 to S Bakari, £5,175.60 to M Ritchie and £11,509.72 to B Jennings. The judge took the effective redundancy date as 2 April 2024 on the basis that the first respondent could not have lawfully traded after that date, notwithstanding that the letters identified a different redundancy date for one claimant and that the claimants had worked and been paid up to 13 June 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Reference under s170 Employment Rights Act 1996; tribunal confirmed entitlement to a redundancy payment of £1,304.16 for S Bakari (case 3306665/2024). | Upheld | — | £1,304 |
| Redundancy | Reference under s170 Employment Rights Act 1996; tribunal confirmed entitlement to a redundancy payment of £5,175.60 for M Ritchie (case listed in judgment as 330666/2024, part of the joined proceedings). | Upheld | — | £5,176 |
| Redundancy | Reference under s170 Employment Rights Act 1996; tribunal confirmed entitlement to a redundancy payment of £11,509.72 for B Jennings (case 3306667/2024). | Upheld | — | £11,510 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,990
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s170 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s166(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s166(2)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.