Case 3306669/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Denton (Counsel) For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306669/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Members
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mrs Goding, Mrs Smith
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss J Denton (Counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Cambridge before Employment Judge King with lay members Mrs Goding and Mrs Smith. It dealt with three disability discrimination claims brought by Ms Emma Cornhill against Cambian Group Plc under the Equality Act 2010.
The indirect disability discrimination claim under section 19 was recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal. The direct disability discrimination claim under section 13 was rejected as not well founded and dismissed.
The claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability, was found to be well founded. The written record does not set out any monetary award. It also notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the s.19 Equality Act 2010 indirect disability discrimination claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the s.13 Equality Act 2010 direct disability discrimination claim was 'not well founded'. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the s.15 Equality Act 2010 claim for discrimination arising from disability was well founded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 19 Equality Act 2010
- Section 13 Equality Act 2010
- Section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.