Case 3306671/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Curtin v And Decontamination Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3306671/2019
- Decision date
- 27 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Curtin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a judgment under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 striking out the claim. The reasons recorded were that the respondent company had been dissolved and the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 31 October 2020 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a substantive claim category. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because the respondent company had been dissolved and the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 31 October 2020 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.