Case 3306674/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Caldarar v Dream Care Norwich Ltd t/a Fuchsia Homecare Norwich — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306674/2021
- Decision date
- 31 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Caldarar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard at Norwich Employment Tribunal on 31 January 2022 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant, Mr I Caldarar, did not attend. The respondent, Dream Care Norwich Ltd t/a Fuchsia Homecare Norwich, was represented by Miss A Bann.
The judgment states that the claimant's claim was dismissed as no longer actively pursued because of the claimant's non-attendance at the hearing. No substantive determination on the underlying merits is recorded in the judgment text provided.
The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's usual process.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claimant's claim was dismissed as no longer actively pursued because the claimant did not attend the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.