Case 3306688/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v No appearance or — 2018
- Case reference
- 3306688/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kurrein Statement
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response or attend the hearing. The tribunal heard the Claimant's evidence and considered the documents, and was satisfied that the Claimant was entitled to damages from the First Respondent for breach of contract.
The First Respondent was ordered to pay sums for unreimbursed expenses, medical insurance costs, failure to provide travel insurance, and unpaid pension contributions. The tribunal found it had no jurisdiction over claims for bonus, commission, future loss of earnings, share award, legal fees, and emotional distress, giving reasons including that some sums were not payable at the effective date of termination and that no discrimination claim had been pleaded.
The judgment recorded that the two respondents were in reality the same entity, but the claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The First Respondent was ordered to pay damages for breach of contract: expenses, medical insurance, travel insurance, and pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £10,724 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction over breach of contract claims for bonus, commission, and future loss of earnings because none of those sums were payable at the effective date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction in respect of any alleged entitlement to a share award, reimbursement of legal fees, or emotional distress. Claims against the Second Respondent were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,724
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.