Case 3306694/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr T Sheppard — 2019
- Case reference
- 3306694/2019
- Decision date
- 13 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Karim had worked for Debenhams Retail Limited since 26 October 2005. Her contract changed on 2 December 2012 to a Peak Hour Contract, which the Tribunal treated as effectively a zero-hours arrangement. The claimant said she did not understand that she retained an entitlement to annual leave under that contract and did not ask for holiday or holiday pay until November 2018, after a colleague told her she was entitled to it.
The Tribunal accepted that the respondent had not shown that the claimant received or signed the Peak Hour contract documents, and found that she was unaware of her entitlement because of the failure of management to ensure that she received the contractual documentation and understood how holiday entitlement worked. It also accepted that line managers had responsibility for monitoring and explaining holiday entitlement, and that this may not have been done thoroughly. The respondent made an ex gratia payment of £919.88 on 21 December 2018, which the Tribunal found related to holiday pay for the 18 months before the issue was raised.
Applying section 13 and section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Tribunal held that holiday pay could be brought as an unlawful deduction of wages claim but that the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014 limited recovery to the two years before the claim was presented on 25 February 2019. On that basis, the claimant could not recover holiday pay before 25 February 2017, but remained entitled to claim unpaid holiday pay for 25 February 2017 to 29 May 2017, after taking account of the respondent's payment. The Tribunal said it did not have enough information to calculate the amount for that period on a final basis and listed the matter for a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded only to the extent permitted by the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014 and after credit for the respondent's ex gratia payment of £919.88 on 21 December 2018. The Tribunal listed the case for a remedy hearing to calculate the balance due for 25 February 2017 to 29 May 2017. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Stringer 2009 ICR 985
- NHS Leeds v Larner 2012 ICR 1389
- Bear Scotland Ltd and ors v Fulton and ors 2015 ICR 221
- Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.