Case 3306703/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mr C Sheldon v SA and CV Escreet T/a Simons News — 2019

Case reference: 3306703/2019
Decision date: 23 August 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr C Sheldon

Respondent

SA and CV Escreet T/a Simons News

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The respondent failed to present a response to the claim. Under Rule 21 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, judgment was entered in favour of Mr C Sheldon on his claim for unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal recorded that he was owed unpaid wages and awarded him £1,945.00 in compensation, which the respondent was ordered to pay.

The judgment did not determine the holiday pay issue. It records that the hearing listed for 11 December 2019 would remain in place to consider any application to amend the claim to include matters arising after the original submission, any amended issues if permission were granted, and the claimant's holiday pay claim.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The respondent did not present a response, so judgment was entered under Rule 21. The judgment records an award of £1,945.00 for unpaid wages. The separate holiday pay issue was left for a later hearing listed on 11 December 2019.	Upheld	—	£1,945

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £1,945; across all upheld claims
Compensatory award: £1,945; compensatory remedy recorded

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.