Case 3306703/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Prasal v Emtac Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306703/2024
- Decision date
- 30 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Prasal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs A Prasal, brought complaints against Emtac Limited which were heard by Employment Judge M Warren at Norwich by CVP on 30 July 2025. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal determined three matters in the claimant's favour.
The tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract in respect of notice pay well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £8,000 as damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect that the sum was likely to be taxable as Post Employment Notice Pay. Under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 the tribunal determined that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,923.04.
The complaint in respect of holiday pay was also well-founded, the tribunal finding that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date her employment ended, and ordered payment of £615.40 as damages, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim well-founded; £8,000 awarded as damages, calculated on gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £8,000 |
| Redundancy | Entitlement to a redundancy payment determined under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £4,923 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint well-founded; respondent in breach of contract for failing to pay accrued but untaken holiday on termination. Claimant responsible for tax/NI. | Upheld | — | £615 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,538
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.163 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.