Case 3306706/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Cleverley v Emtac Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306706/2024
- Decision date
- 30 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Cleverley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay Mrs S Cleverley 12500 pounds as damages for breach of contract, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that tax would be payable as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The Tribunal also found the holiday pay complaint well-founded. It found that the respondent was in breach of contract by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended, and ordered payment of 673.09 pounds.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay complaint was described as breach of contract and well-founded. | Upheld | — | £12,500 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay complaint was described as well-founded; the judgment also stated the respondent was in breach of contract in failing to pay accrued untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £673 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,173
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.