Case 3306718/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Maclennan & Others (see attached schedule) v Everest 2020 Limited (in administration) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306718/2024
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr A Maclennan & Others (see attached schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that the claimants were employed at the same establishment at Building 1, Albany Place, Welwyn Garden City, and were made redundant on 29 April 2024. There was no recognised trade union or elected employee representatives at the establishment, and 20 or more employees were made redundant or placed at risk of redundancy on or within 90 days of that date.
The Tribunal found that the claimants were dismissed during that period without any consultation having taken place. It also noted that the last dismissal occurred on 7 June 2024, so all claims were likely to have been presented within the time limit in section 189(5)(b) of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The first respondent had not filed a response, but its administrators consented to the protective award claim proceeding, and the second respondent had not filed a response. The Tribunal held there was no reason to depart from the principle that protective awards are punitive and should be for the maximum period unless circumstances make it just not to do so, and made a 90-day protective award beginning on 29 April 2024. The Recoupment Regulations apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim for a protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The locked taxonomy has no specific protective award category, so classified as other rather than redundancy_pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 188 Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(5)(b) Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- protective awards are punitive and should be for the maximum period unless there are circumstances making it just not to do so
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.