Case 3306738/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Lewis v Mulleys Motorways Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306738/2021
- Decision date
- 5 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a coach driver, resigned with notice and the dispute concerned holiday pay on termination after a period of furlough in 2020. The tribunal treated the ET1 as advancing both a Working Time Regulations claim and a breach of contract claim. It found that the leave year ran from 1 January to 31 December, that the claimant could carry over unused contractual holiday, and that he had taken a number of agreed days off in 2019, 2020 and early 2021.
On the Working Time Regulations claim, the tribunal accepted that the respondent had not instructed the claimant to take annual leave during furlough. It considered the regulation 14 calculation and concluded that, even on assumptions favourable to the claimant, the amount already paid on termination was more than the statutory minimum due. It therefore dismissed the WTR complaint as not well-founded.
On the contract claim, the tribunal found that the parties' contractual arrangement entitled the claimant to carry over unused holiday and to be paid in lieu of unused entitlement on termination. It held that the parties had not agreed to reduce 2020 holiday entitlement because of furlough, and that the bank holidays in April and May 2020 were treated as holiday under the existing agreement even though the claimant was only paid 80% at the time. The tribunal also accepted the claimant's entitlement to 6.15 days for 2021 and 12 days of 2020 entitlement carried forward to termination.
Using an hourly/wage-based calculation, the tribunal assessed the contractual entitlement as £69 for the four furlough bank-holiday top-ups and £1,634.23 for unused holiday in lieu, making £1,703.23 in total. Against the £953.80 already paid, it found a shortfall of £749.43 gross and ordered that sum as damages for breach of contract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was contractually entitled to carry-over holiday, a payment in lieu of unused holiday on termination, and a 20% top-up for four bank holidays during furlough. It assessed the contractual entitlement at £1,703.23 and, after deducting the £953.80 already paid, awarded £749.43 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £749 |
| Working time regulations | The complaint under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed. The tribunal held that, even assuming the claimant's favourable arguments, the payment on termination exceeded the amount due under regulation 14. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £749
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Regulation 14 WTR formula
- Regulation 13(9) WTR
- Regulation 13(10)-(13) WTR
- Regulation 17 WTR
- Beijing Ton Ren Tang (UK) Ltd v Ms S P Wang
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.