Case 3306823/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Williams v Alpha Construction East Anglia Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306823/2021
- Decision date
- 21 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Norwich on 21 March 2022, Employment Judge Postle gave judgment in the case of Mr O Williams v Alpha Construction East Anglia Limited. The tribunal found that Mr Williams was not unfairly dismissed, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The judgment also records an order that the respondent pay four weeks' gross pay in relation to failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment. The extracted text does not set out any further reasoning, nor does it specify a separate monetary figure for that award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay four weeks' gross pay for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment. The extracted text does not specify the statutory basis or a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.