Case 3306825/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Spooner (in person) For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3306825/2021
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen Appearances
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Spooner (in person) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claimant failed to issue her claim within the time limit in s.111(2) and s.23(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim.
The judgment records that all claims were dismissed. No liability findings were made on the underlying substantive complaints because the time limit point was dispositive.
The published judgment does not set out any remedy assessment, and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not list the individual pleaded claims, but the GOV.UK listing for this case includes unfair dismissal. The tribunal dismissed all claims because the claim was not issued in time and it had no jurisdiction under s.111(2) and s.23(4) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not list the individual pleaded claims, but the GOV.UK listing for this case includes disability discrimination. The tribunal dismissed all claims because the claim was not issued in time and it had no jurisdiction under s.111(2) and s.23(4) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.