Case 3306835/2018 · Employment Tribunal

Mr I Komusanac, Solicitor For the v Respondent — 2020

Case reference: 3306835/2018
Decision date: 19 October 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge C Palmer Appearances
Venue: Watford

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

Mr I Komusanac, Solicitor For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The hearing took place at Watford on 7 October 2019 before Employment Judge C Palmer, with Mr I Komusanac for the claimant and Mr R Oulton for the respondent. The written judgment records three dispositions: the claim against the second respondent was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed, the sex discrimination claim was withdrawn and dismissed, and the claim for discrimination arising from disability was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed.

The decision contains no substantive findings on liability beyond those withdrawals, and it records no compensation or other remedy. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The claim against the second respondent was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed.	Withdrawn	—	—
Sex discrimination	The claimant's sex discrimination claim was withdrawn and dismissed.	Withdrawn	Sex	—
Disability discrimination	The claimant's claim for discrimination arising from disability was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed.	Withdrawn	Disability	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.