Case 3306905/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Paschali, Solicitor For the v Mr G Ridgeway, Consultant — 2018
- Case reference
- 3306905/2018
- Decision date
- 13 February 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Paschali, Solicitor For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr Xiouri's employment ended on 13 February 2018 and that his service agreement salary had been amended on 1 July 2017 to an annual salary of £33,000. It also found that his probation period, extended on 2 June 2017, ended on 3 September 2017.
On liability, the tribunal held that he was entitled to the use of a company car until termination, to a wage for the notice period from 9 November 2017 to 13 February 2018, and to the benefit of employer pension contributions for that same notice period. It further found that he had accrued leave during the notice period and was entitled to payment on termination for untaken leave.
The judgment did not set a final monetary award. Instead, it recorded that the parties were to agree the calculations and that the issue of remedy was reserved pending submission of those figures to the tribunal.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to the use of a company car until termination and to the benefit of employer pension contributions for the notice period from 9 November 2017 to 13 February 2018. Remedy was reserved pending agreed calculations. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a wage during his notice period from 9 November 2017 to 13 February 2018. Remedy was reserved pending agreed calculations. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found that the claimant had accrued leave during his notice period and was entitled to a payment on termination for untaken leave. Remedy was reserved pending agreed calculations. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.