Case 3306968/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Mahmood – Litigation Consultant — 2024
- Case reference
- 3306968/2023
- Decision date
- 22 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Brown Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Cambridge, sitting by CVP, dealt with Mrs J Thomas's complaint of breach of contract against Innovative Trials Ltd. Employment Judge L Brown found the complaint in relation to notice pay was well-founded. No other claims or issues are recorded in the written judgment extract.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £9,161.43 as damages for breach of contract, calculated using net pay. It also recorded that the respondent was responsible for any tax and national insurance arising from a grossed-up figure. Written reasons were not provided because the decision was given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Complaint was in relation to notice pay. The tribunal held the claim well-founded and awarded damages calculated using net pay. | Upheld | — | £9,161 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,161
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.