Case 3306972/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr O Grundstein v Bobtrade Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3306972/2018
- Decision date
- 16 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr O Grundstein
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the respondent failed to present a response to the claim. Judgment was therefore entered in favour of the claimant, Mr O Grundstein, against Bobtrade Ltd.
The tribunal recorded that the claim for breach of contract and arrears of wages succeeds. No separate monetary figure was fixed in this judgment.
The remedy was left to be determined at a Remedy Hearing listed for 07/05/2019. This decision therefore resolves liability only and does not contain the final award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for breach of contract succeeds, but the remedy was listed for a later hearing on 07/05/2019 and no amount is recorded in this decision. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for arrears of wages succeeds, but the remedy was listed for a later hearing on 07/05/2019 and no amount is recorded in this decision. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.