Case 3306991/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Harrison v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3306991/2023
- Decision date
- 1 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Harrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 15 August 2025, the tribunal gave Ms A Harrison until 29 August 2025 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal order dated 31 May 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued, and that there had been no response to the respondent's application dated 31 July 2025.
Ms A Harrison did not make any written representations and did not ask for a hearing. The tribunal held that it was proportionate to strike out the claim. The hearing listed for 15 to 24 September 2025 will not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment itself refers only to 'the claim' and does not restate the substantive claim type; the GOV.UK case listing identifies the case as disability discrimination. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.