Case 3307010/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Strzezek v AR Healthcare and Pharma Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3307010/2022
- Decision date
- 7 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Strzezek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Watford Employment Tribunal on 11 June 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Hawksworth Date determined that the claim could properly be decided under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in relation to wages owed for March 2022. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £726.84.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £242.28 in respect of that head of claim. The judgment records no separate breakdown of additional remedy elements, and the total of the sums awarded is £969.12.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for March 2022 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £726.84. | Upheld | — | £727 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £242.28. | Upheld | — | £242 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £969
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.