Case 3307018/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Lansiquot v BAU Mechanical Electrical Plumbing Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3307018/2022
- Decision date
- 5 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daniels Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Lansiquot
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr J Lansiquot's claims for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract against Bau Mechanical Electrical Plumbing Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) were well founded and succeeded. The hearing was listed at Watford Employment Tribunal by Cloud Video Platform on 4 May 2022, with Employment Judge Daniels sitting alone; the respondent did not appear.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said the claim for unlawful deductions from wages was well founded and succeeded. The remedy was not split between this claim and the breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal said the breach of contract claim was well founded and succeeded. The remedy was not split between this claim and the unlawful deductions claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the race discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,426
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.