Case 3307028/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Carter v Airflow Developments Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3307028/2022
- Decision date
- 23 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S Carter
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment. By letter dated 12 May 2023, the tribunal gave Mr Carter until 26 May 2023 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out, including on the respondent's application dated 2 May 2023 and on the basis that the claims had not been actively pursued. He did not make written representations and did not ask for a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out all claims in case 3307104/2022. To the extent that any part of case 3307028/2022 survived the unless order sent on 6 March 2023, any and all remaining parts were also struck out. The judgment did not determine the merits of any underlying claim and made no monetary award.
The vacated hearing listed for 22 May 2023 was not rescheduled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out all claims after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing by 26 May 2023. The judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claims or award any compensation. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out all claims after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing by 26 May 2023. The judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claims or award any compensation. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out all claims after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing by 26 May 2023. The judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claims or award any compensation. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal struck out all claims after the claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing by 26 May 2023. The judgment did not determine the merits of the underlying claims or award any compensation. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.