Case 3307051/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3307051/2022
- Decision date
- 26 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms P Barratt, Mr A Scott
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford Employment Tribunal on 23, 24, 25 and 26 October 2023 before Employment Judge Alliott, sitting with Ms P Barratt and Mr A Scott. The written judgment dated 26 October 2023 records that the claimant's claim was dismissed in its entirety.
The short written record does not set out the tribunal's substantive findings or any split outcome between the pleaded claims. It also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not set out separate reasoning for individual claims; it states that the claimant's claim was dismissed in its entirety. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written record does not set out separate reasoning for individual claims; it states that the claimant's claim was dismissed in its entirety. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.